Tariff Stacking, Section 232 Updates & Practical Strategies for Today’s Importers. In April 2025, sweeping tariff actions reshaped global trade. For many importers, the complexity hasn’t slowed down since. Tariff stacking, evolving Section 232 measures, and overlapping duty programs are…
BIS: Portland Company Faces Three-Year Export Denial Order for Persistent EAR Violations
BIS: Portland Company Faces Three-Year Export Denial Order for Persistent EAR Violations
USGoBuy, a Portland, OR company, has had a three-year denial order issued. This prohibits them for participating in all EAR-subject exports from the US. This is because USGoBuy, a package forwarding company, has had continued violations of the EAR and failed to address their compliance failures. The package forwarding business model is to allow non-US customers to buy things online from US retailers and have them shipped to the Oregon warehouse, then consolidating the packages and exporting them from the US.
Related Posts
USTR: 2026 Trade Agenda Targets Supply Chains China Balance and USMCA Review
The Office of the United States Trade Representative outlined its 2026 priorities with a focus on expanding the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade program, strengthening enforcement of existing trade agreements, and securing supply chains for critical minerals and strategic industries. The strategy includes efforts to re shore critical minerals mining and processing through a preferential trade…
DOJ: Courts Signal Refund Path as IEEPA Tariff Disputes Intensify
Recent court activity surrounding tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act suggests the judiciary expects the administration to move toward issuing refunds. Judges reviewing the challenges have indicated that the legal basis for maintaining the tariffs in certain cases is weakening, and the government is under increasing pressure to clarify its next steps….
USTR: Administration Outlines Next Phase of Tariff Enforcement and Trade Investigations
The administration has detailed a broad strategy to advance its trade objectives while reinforcing existing enforcement tools. Officials confirmed that a temporary 10 percent surcharge will be applied to certain imports under Section 122 authority as a means of stabilizing trade policy during ongoing negotiations. In parallel, new Section 301 investigations will examine a wide…
USTR: Administration Announces Import Surcharge to Address Balance of Payments Deficit
Federal law, including section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, authorizes the President to impose temporary import surcharges and other restrictions when the nation faces serious international payments challenges. Acting under this authority, the Administration has determined that an ad valorem import surcharge is necessary to respond to substantial balance of payments deficits. Officials…
