Case Study on Navigating a CF-28: How a Newly Independent Manufacturer Turned Its First Compliance Test Into a Win

Case Study on Navigating a CF-28: How a Newly Independent Manufacturer Turned Its First Compliance Test Into a Win

Eight months isn’t a lot of time, but that’s precisely how long we had to help a brand-new independent industrial paints manufacturer build a compliance program from the ground up, after divesting from its former organization. Then, right after the dust settled, they received a CF-28 (CBP Form 28) letter. Not an ideal scenario for a business still in its infancy. 

Before that one CF-28 CBP inquiry could snowball into an avalanche of inquiries, we acted quickly, which is key when handling this type of situation. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) knows that entries are more complex, so they’re using artificial intelligence and other tech to more carefully scrutinize some of these cases. 

Here’s an overview of what happened next and what every business can learn from it. 

The Challenge 

In April 2025, the client divested from its parent company, becoming their own entity practically overnight. However, there was a window of six to eight months where the company was fully independent and had to build a compliance program from the ground up. 

Entries filed under both company names during the transition triggered a compliance alert, raising some red flags with CBP. This smaller compliance team that transferred from the parent company to this new enterprise now found themselves with a higher level of regulatory responsibility that they previously had not been accustomed to handling.  

There was a lot of risk involved here—not just from a financial standpoint, but a reputational perspective. First impressions are everything, and the last thing a new company wants is to be on customs’ radar. If you get it wrong, they take notice, and quickly. 

The Solution 

Remember those eight months of transition? They came in handy as we worked with the client to proactively build this new compliance program. So, when the CF-28 arrived, we already knew the client's products, classifications, and business activity. We weren’t starting from square one, because we already spoke the client’s language. 

Our role was twofold: acting as a strategic consultant, offering guidance and an external point of view, and employing our technical expertise, especially when USCMA knowledge was needed. The client was capable and proactive, and we simply added a layer of confidence and additional knowledge to the working partnership. 

The Approach 

The moment the CF-28 arrived, the client contacted us to review the inquiry and existing documentation. We then made sure to ask clarifying questions and established a baseline of where things stood. When it comes to these types of inquiries, you have 30 days to respond, so time is of the essence. 

We brought in the right experts from our team, who have extensive knowledge of the complexity of USMCA, to educate the client on the requirements. We took a deep dive into reviewing bill of materials, HTS classification check, USMCA compatibility assessment, and FTA documentation, revising it until it was just right. 

Then, after this thorough process of reviewing with the client, we submitted our response to customs. Shortly thereafter, we received word that customs had accepted our response and had no further inquiries at this time. 

You could say translating dense regulatory language into clear operational steps is our bread and butter. 

The Impact 

Let’s talk about the numbers: $1,500 saved, zero cascading inquiries triggered, and zero audits initiated. But in this case, the stats don’t tell the whole story. The real win is that a small compliance team at an upstart company was able to confidently handle a potentially big problem, with the help of a trusted partner in our team. 

By reaching out immediately once the letter was received, the team was able to collaborate and validate the compliance program that was built for this exact scenario. It was stress tested and passed with flying colors.  

Sometimes it’s less about the dollar signs and more about instilling the confidence in a team that they can handle whatever comes their way. We’ll always be right here as a trusted partner to assist, if needed. 

Lessons for the Industry 

This situation offers some great insights to highlight and review. 

CF-28 inquiries are rising. CBP is utilizing more advanced tools to catch errors, and entries have never been more complex. This system and process is here to stay, so be proactive, rather than reactive. 

Back up every claim. Before customs comes knocking, documentation should already be in place, especially if you're changing a classification or making a USMCA claim. Don't file first and figure it out later. Have a plan and process in place. 

Act fast. Thirty days may seem like a long lead time, but the deadline can sneak up on you if you delay or don’t have a proactive plan in place. The clients who wait two weeks to address the issue are already behind. Don’t let that be you. 

Don't panic. A CF-28 is simply an inquiry. Take a deep breath, review your plan, and respond to it thoroughly. Treat this situation as an opportunity to demonstrate a strong compliance program.  

CF-28 inquiries are on the rise, and they don't come with much warning. If you want to make sure you're prepared, or you're already navigating one, don’t hesitate to reach out. We've been here before, and we're happy to help walk you through the process. 

Related Posts

Person holding a tablet device

Data Quality in Trade Compliance: Governance Practices That Prevent Costly Errors and Delays

Melissa MerkleManager, Star USA Data quality is a major risk control across trade compliance. Data quality issues like inconsistent classifications, unreliable origin determinations, and incomplete valuation details can compound across systems. They may not be noticed for a while, but they surface as customs holds, duty miscalculations, or enforcement actions.  The good news is that…

A man sitting in front of a large computer in a light-filled office

Designing a High-Performance Trade Compliance Program Operating Model: Roles, Routines, and KPIs

Melissa Merkle Manager, Star USA Trade compliance programs fail in predictable ways. Not because companies lack the intention to get it right, but because good intentions don’t hold up when there’s no clear structure behind them. When performance is measured by activity rather than outcomes, compliance becomes reactive and absorbs problems rather than prevents them.   Building something better starts with three…

Two coworkers make plans for tariff savings at their desk while looking at a notebook

Tariff Savings Case Study: Identifying $2M+ in Client’s Potential Savings

Most compliance engagements start with a signed contract. This one started with a refusal.   When a major U.S. importer issued a competitive RFP for trade compliance services, the conventional move would have been to sharpen our pencils, compete on price, and hope for the win. Instead, we realized the importer needed more than just another vendor. They needed…

Two people shaking hands in a warehouse

How Strong Trade Compliance Helps You Win and Keep Enterprise Customers

Melissa MerkleEducation & Outreach Manager, Star USA If “we’re working on it” is your current trade compliance strategy, enterprise customers have already noticed. Blunt? Perhaps, but it’s the kind of honest observation that saves a lot of time.   Large, sophisticated customers are no longer treating trade compliance as an afterthought buried in legal review. It’s become part of how they evaluate whether…